Repository navigation
📌 Update, Oct 2026: how onboarding works (community notes)This thread became the place to request listing on github.com/mcp. These notes collect what's been said here. The process (based on the accepted answer, @trent-j, May 2026):
Include all of these in your request:
Check before you post (read the values from the registry, not from memory): Check whether you're already listed on GitHub's side: Community notes from this thread. Corrections welcome. Original question (Oct 2025): Hi community! Looking for clarification on how the GitHub MCP Registry works. Server: claude-faf-mcp Questions Is github.com/mcp a curated list (vs automatic sync)? Why We Ask Previously posted: modelcontextprotocol/registry #690 Thanks for any insights! 🙏 |
Replies: 297 comments 13 replies
|
39 days, no response. claude-faf-mcp is approved by Anthropic (PR #2759 MERGED), has 10,067+ npm downloads, but isn't visible on github.com/mcp despite being listed in modelcontextprotocol/servers. What are the curation criteria for github.com/mcp? Is there a separate approval process beyond the Anthropic PR? Links: |
|
🎉 Update: Additional Milestone Since Posting
This makes claude-faf-mcp:
Full details: https://www.faf.one/blog/iana-registration Still curious about the github.com/mcp curation process and happy to |
|
Hey @Wolfe-Jam, |
|
Hey HolgerMany thanks for your reply, we will take of it and let you know. thanks again,James (Wolfe) HarrisonFounderWolfe James LLCfaf.one - Project DNA for AI contextIANA Registered format .FAF for AI context application/vnd.faf+yaml"README evolution for AI era"Google Gemini CLI(9.5/10 Rating)
On Nov 10 2025, at 8:52 am, Holger Staudacher ***@***.***> wrote:
Hey @Wolfe-Jam,
right now the GitHub MCP registry is a curated list. This will change in a couple days when we enable sync with the open source registry. In order to get your server added, you have to publish it to the open source registry first. Here is a guide how to publish your server if you haven't done it already.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
Hey @hstaudacher - following up from November. Just published both FAF packages to the open source registry today:
Ready for sync whenever that goes live. If there's anything blocking the registry sync rollout, happy to help test, validate, or contribute. We've been through the mcp-publisher flow and can provide feedback if useful. |
|
Hey @hstaudacher — friendly follow-up from the November conversation about registry sync. Quick update on where things stand: we now have 6 FAF MCP servers published to the open source registry, all passing
All published via You mentioned back in November that github.com/mcp would start syncing from the open source registry. Is that sync live now? If so, is there something on our end we need to do to appear? If it's still in progress, totally understand — just want to make sure we're not missing a step. Happy to help test or validate anything on the sync pipeline. |
|
Status check, 2026-05-18: github.com/mcp still shows ~97 servers, so the open-source-registry sync doesn't look live yet. The FAF servers remain published & schema-clean on the OSS registry. If the list stays curated long-term: Is there an ETA for the sync, or is github.com/mcp staying curated? Either answer's fine — closing the loop on this thread. |
|
Hi @Wolfe-Jam, thanks for the thoughtful follow-up and for continuing to publish and validate your servers. A few clarifications from our side: the GitHub MCP Registry now has the ability to sync versions from the open source registry, but onboarding a new server is still a manual curation process today. Once a server has been onboarded, newly published versions from the OSS registry should sync from there. I’m closer to the technical side than the product/curation criteria, so I don’t want to overstate anything here. I’ll share your request with our product team and ask whether we’re able to move forward with onboarding them. Thanks again for your patience, and for offering to help validate the sync path. |
|
Hey @trent-j — thanks again for looking into this and for offering to take it to the product team, genuinely appreciate it. Quick update from our side: since May we've moved our two flagship servers to the FAF Foundation's DNS-verified No rush at all on the github.com/mcp side — mostly I'd love to understand the lay of the land so we can be ready: is onboarding/sync something that's moving, or staying curated for now? And if there's a process, criteria, or anything we should prep on our end to make it easy when the time comes, happy to do the legwork. Either way — thanks for keeping the channel open. 🙏 |
Onboarding request:
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Official registry name | io.github.edithatogo/fyi-mcp |
| Latest version | 0.1.2 (active / isLatest) |
| Repository | https://github.com/edithatogo/fyi-cli |
| server.json | https://github.com/edithatogo/fyi-cli/blob/master/server.json |
| Description | Local-first FOI/OIA request tracker MCP for Alaveteli platforms (FYI.org.nz and multi-jurisdiction catalog) |
OSS registry verification
curl -sS "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0/servers?search=fyi-mcp"
returns io.github.edithatogo/fyi-mcp v0.1.2 active/latest.
github.com/mcp status (2026-07-09)
- Search
fyi-mcp/edithatogodoes not surface a curated card for this server https://github.com/mcp/io.github.edithatogo/fyi-mcp→ 404
Could the product/curation team please consider onboarding this server so OSS version sync can take effect? Happy to provide additional metadata or validation help.
Tracked in: edithatogo/fyi-cli#32
Onboarding request:
|
Onboarding request:
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Official Registry name | io.github.happy520ai/unified-ai-system |
| Latest version | 0.4.8 (active) |
| Package / transport | ghcr.io/happy520ai/unified-ai-system/mcp-server:0.4.8 / stdio |
| Repository | https://github.com/happy520ai/unified-ai-system |
| Manifest | https://github.com/happy520ai/unified-ai-system/blob/master/server.json |
| Documentation | https://happy520ai.github.io/unified-ai-system/codex-mcp-docker-quickstart.html |
Unified AI System is an Apache-2.0 self-hosted gateway that gives Codex, Cursor, Cline, and generic MCP clients nine bounded tools. Its differentiating first-run path turns rough natural-language requests into structured, reviewable prompts locally, with a deterministic fake provider and no account or API key required. Real provider calls remain explicit and disabled by default.
The repository publishes pinned OCI images and runs public CI, container, MCP discovery, security-scanner, clean-clone, and process-cleanup checks. The Official Registry currently contains versions 0.3.1 through 0.4.8; GitHub MCP search still returns no result.
Please consider onboarding this server so future Official Registry versions can sync. I am happy to provide any additional metadata or validation evidence the curation team needs.
|
Onboarding request: Following the OSS-registry-first process confirmed in this thread (publish to the open source registry, then request manual onboarding; versions sync after):
Derive gives agent output a permanent home. One call publishes a document, styled page, deck, or report to a versioned URL a teammate can open and comment on inline; the agent reads those comments back and revises. Every tool carries a title and honest Nothing to install and no key to paste — it is a remote server behind OAuth with dynamic client registration. Self-hosting is a single container, for teams that cannot send work to a hosted service. OSS registry verification: returns github.com/mcp status (2026-08-12): a search for Could the curation team consider onboarding this so future OSS registry versions sync automatically? Happy to provide any further metadata or validation. |
|
Onboarding request for a server already published to the OSS registry, following the format used earlier in this thread.
Happy to provide a populated test account for review. Thanks for considering. |
|
Requesting onboarding for a new server:
OSS registry verification: curl -s "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0/servers?search=io.github.rafaelgaspar/longhorn-mcp"returns the server with Publishing is automated via GitHub Actions OIDC on every tagged release ( |
Onboarding request: VenuNite EventsPlease onboard VenuNite Events into the GitHub MCP Registry.
Verification: curl 'https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers?search=io.github.isaacaskew%2Fvenunite-events&version=latest'An anonymous live check on October 24 successfully initialized the server, discovered both tools, and returned three events from |
Onboarding request: Velox TriFitPlease consider onboarding Velox TriFit to github.com/mcp and the VS Code MCP gallery. We maintain this service under Velox-XR. Correction, 24 October 2026: this existing request now points to the current unified MCP connection. The initial 1.1.0 publication selected the legacy documentation-only endpoint; version 2.0.0 supersedes it under the same registry identifier. This is not a second listing.
The server provides official DressMe API documentation, SDK examples and backend-integration guidance for web/mobile developers, alongside authenticated TriFit capabilities. Coding-agent configurations restrict documentation tasks to four public tools: search, fetch, get_integration_example and get_partner_access_requirements. The additional public tool is get_partner_application_guide. Verification: curl "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers/io.github.Velox-XR%2Fvelox-trifit-developer/versions/2.0.0"
curl "https://api.mcp.github.com/v0.1/servers?search=velox-trifit"Native Codex CLI and GitHub Copilot CLI each passed all four documentation calls against this current endpoint on 24 October 2026, with no TriFit login, account access, uploads or generation. The successful guarded publication workflow also checked the 18-tool authentication metadata and repeated the four anonymous calls: https://github.com/Velox-XR/trifit-partner-api-example/actions/runs/40103119691 These checks do not establish VS Code UI, hosted Copilot mixed-auth compatibility or authenticated generation. GitHub curated onboarding remains pending; official registry publication is not a claim of GitHub approval. Thank you for considering the listing. |
Onboarding request:
|
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Official MCP Registry ID | io.github.getremcp/docsy |
| Version | 1.0.9, current registry release |
| Transport | Remote Streamable HTTP |
| MCP URL | https://docsy.remcp.site/mcp/registry |
| Authentication | OAuth 2.1; unauthenticated 401 is expected |
| Public repository | https://github.com/getremcp/docsy-plugin |
| Documentation | https://github.com/getremcp/docsy-plugin/blob/main/docs/GETTING-STARTED.md and https://docsy.remcp.site/docs |
| License | MIT (public plugin) |
| What it does | Read-only, source-cited current and version-specific documentation for developer libraries, frameworks and SDKs |
| MCP tools | resolve-library-id, list-library-versions, query-docs, search, fetch |
Docsy is published in the official MCP Registry under the organization-owned getremcp namespace. Please note the public plugin repository is the release distribution; the hosted indexing infrastructure is separate.
Maintainer: @antonbaider.
|
Hi, I maintain artifacts.boo. Could you consider it for the GitHub MCP Registry?
GitHub's Registry search for boo.artifacts returned no entries on 24 October. Does this workspace-template setup fit your curation requirements? |
Onboarding request: io.github.socialbu/socialbuPlease consider SocialBu for the GitHub MCP catalog. SocialBu's official hosted MCP server lets users create and schedule social posts, manage connected accounts and queues, read analytics, and work with automations, inbox conversations, and social listening after authorizing their SocialBu account.
The public repository contains client manifests and reusable agent instructions; the server is hosted by SocialBu. A SocialBu account is required. The existing Registry identity is active and marked |
|
Requesting onboarding to github.com/mcp for a remote server, following the format in the "Update, Oct 2026" note above.
Publisher: Atromx Intelligence Private Limited, [email protected]. |
|
Onboarding Request | Requesting onboarding to
Verificationcurl "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers?search=io.github.Wallet-Wall/walletwall"
curl "https://api.mcp.github.com/v0.1/servers?search=walletwall"The first query returns the current Official MCP Registry record. The second is expected to return no GitHub MCP Registry result until initial onboarding is completed. Onboarding request
If additional metadata, validation evidence, packaging changes, or compatibility checks are required for curation, please let us know and we’ll provide them. Publisher: Wallet-Wall |
Onboarding request:
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Official Registry name | sh.nextmail/mcp (domain-verified namespace) |
| Version | 1.0.4, active, isLatest: true |
| Transport | Streamable HTTP |
| Endpoint | https://api.nextmail.sh/mcp |
| Authentication | OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and dynamic client registration; an unauthenticated request gets a 401 with the protected resource metadata |
| Repository | https://github.com/nextmailhq/mcp |
| Manifest | https://github.com/nextmailhq/mcp/blob/main/server.json |
| Documentation | https://nextmail.sh/docs/mcp/overview |
| License | MIT |
Verification:
curl "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers?search=sh.nextmail"
curl "https://api.mcp.github.com/v0.1/servers?search=nextmail"GitHub's registry search for nextmail returned no entries on 25 October 2026. Thank you for considering it.
Onboarding request: com.pondchat/pondchat
|
Onboarding request:
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Official Registry name | ai.nexrex/nexrex (domain-verified namespace) |
| Version | 1.0.0, active, isLatest: true |
| Transport | Streamable HTTP |
| Endpoint | https://mcp.nexrex.ai/mcp |
| Authentication | OAuth 2.1 with PKCE (S256), Client ID Metadata Documents; no API key |
| Repository | None. NexRex is a hosted commercial service and the server is not open source |
| License | Proprietary (Terms) |
| Docs | https://docs.nexrex.ai/api-reference/mcp-server |
| Support | [email protected] |
Verification:
curl "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers?search=ai.nexrex"
Onboarding request:
|
|
Onboarding request: io.github.Pushary/pushary Pushary is a remote human-in-the-loop server: an agent asks a person, and the person answers from a push notification on their phone (approve, choose an option, or type a reply).
I've also emailed [email protected]. Thanks! |
Onboarding request:
|
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Registry name | io.github.app-kit-dev/mcp |
| Version | 0.1.3 — active, isLatest: true (checked 25 October 2026) |
| Transport | Remote Streamable HTTP, stateless: https://mcp.app-kit.dev/mcp |
| Auth | None required (anonymous free tier); optional Authorization: Bearer mcpf_... free token |
| Repository | https://github.com/app-kit-dev/mcp (docs, client configs, server.json) |
| License | MIT (repository) |
| Homepage | https://app-kit.dev/mcp |
| What it does | SEO audit (400 checks, 0–100 score, top losses), text check (readability, keyword stuffing, grammar EN/RU), image convert/compress to WebP/AVIF, PDF to images and images to PDF |
Verification:
curl "https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers?search=app-kit"
curl "https://api.mcp.github.com/v0.1/servers?search=app-kit" # currently empty
Thanks!
|
Requesting onboarding for TickerMint.
Thanks for considering it. |
|
On behalf of Hudson Kit, please onboard Arc to the GitHub MCP Registry. Arc gives agents tools to author, validate, lay out, render, and diff architecture diagrams as code. It exposes 10 tools and 3 resources, including SVG, PNG, HTML, ASCII, and animation export.
PNG export requires local Chrome/Chromium; GIF/MP4 export also requires ffmpeg. This listing uses the published stdio server, not a hosted endpoint. Registry verification: curl 'https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers?search=io.github.hudsonkit/arc' |
Hi @Wolfe-Jam, thanks for the thoughtful follow-up and for continuing to publish and validate your servers.
A few clarifications from our side: the GitHub MCP Registry now has the ability to sync versions from the open source registry, but onboarding a new server is still a manual curation process today. Once a server has been onboarded, newly published versions from the OSS registry should sync from there.
I’m closer to the technical side than the product/curation criteria, so I don’t want to overstate anything here. I’ll share your request with our product team and ask whether we’re able to move forward with onboarding them.
Thanks again for your patience, and for offering to help valid…