[hardikkaurani]

• I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
• This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized it.
• All filenames are in PascalCase.
• All functions and variable names follow Java naming conventions.
• All new algorithms have a URL in their comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanations.
• All new algorithms include a corresponding test class that validates their functionality.
• All new code is formatted with \clang-format -i --style=file path/to/your/file.java\

Description

This pull request fixes rectangular matrix support and adds null safety in \SearchInARowAndColWiseSortedMatrix:

1. Rectangular Matrix Bound Fix: Previously, column index \j\ was initialized using row count \matrix.length - 1\ rather than column count \matrix[0].length - 1, leading to ignored columns when columns > rows and \ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException\ when rows > columns. Initialized columns using \matrix[0].length\ and rows using \matrix.length.
2. Null and Empty Input Safety: Added guard against
   ull\ matrix, empty 2D array, and null/empty rows, returning {-1, -1}\ safely.
3. Class Final Modifier: Marked \public final class SearchInARowAndColWiseSortedMatrix.
4. Expanded Tests: Added unit tests covering rectangular matrices with more columns than rows, more rows than columns, absent keys in rectangular matrices, null matrix, and empty rows.

CC: @alxkm for review

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing.

[hardikkaurani]

Hi @alxkm, opened this PR to fix column bound initialization in \SearchInARowAndColWiseSortedMatrix\ so rectangular (M x N) matrices work properly without truncation or out-of-bounds errors, alongside null safety checks and test coverage. Whenever convenient, please take a look! Thanks!

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 82.19%. Comparing base (976cebc) to head (0aa3966).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...s/searches/SearchInARowAndColWiseSortedMatrix.java	80.00%	2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #7655      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     82.20%   82.19%   -0.02%     
- Complexity     8394     8397       +3     
============================================
  Files           843      843              
  Lines         26127    26133       +6     
  Branches       5096     5097       +1     
============================================
+ Hits          21479    21481       +2     
- Misses         3858     3860       +2     
- Partials        790      792       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[DenizAltunkapan]

@hardikkaurani thanks