Repository navigation
feat(frontend): match the mobile app's sessions sheet and session header #462
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
578a221
feat(frontend): replace the repos sheet with a sessions picker sheet
chriswritescode-dev 36d35cc
fix(frontend): order linked server projects by last activity and keep…
chriswritescode-dev 52162d5
feat(frontend): show context usage on the composer model pill
chriswritescode-dev d99fcc2
feat(frontend): open session details from the header
chriswritescode-dev df92008
fix: apply CodeRabbit auto-fixes
chriswritescode-dev 651b9b9
docs: allow doc comments in the code style rules
chriswritescode-dev 81fb2d4
fix(frontend): compare the active session's server before closing the…
chriswritescode-dev 52aeb77
feat(frontend): consolidate session picker navigation and remote proj…
chriswritescode-dev bd74657
fix(frontend): scope linked-server pickers to the canonical project a…
chriswritescode-dev de4a9bc
fix(frontend): stretch the session picker tabs across the full width
chriswritescode-dev 4b76524
fix: order linked-server projects by session activity and stop waking…
chriswritescode-dev adb2510
fix(frontend): resolve the deepest owning remote project and refresh …
chriswritescode-dev 80e7f78
test(frontend): wait for the picker's open focus before pressing Ente…
chriswritescode-dev 92c2d49
fix(backend): classify clone auth failures before not-found and isola…
chriswritescode-dev File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality |
Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Align the repository comment rules.
AGENTS.md:20andCONTRIBUTING.md:52allow declaration-attached JSDoc/TSDoc, but.github/copilot-instructions.mdstill requires reviewers to flag any code comments. Update the Copilot instructions or define a clear precedence so contributors and reviewers follow one policy.As per coding guidelines, the supplied rule still says “Any code comments.”
Source: Coding guidelines