[BlackishGreen33]

Summary

Add the official CNA rejection status and a primary-source reference to GHSA-hp3w-g68c-fv3c. Please review whether this GitHub advisory should also be withdrawn.

CVE-2026-97058: REJECTED (2026-10-12)
GHSA-hp3w-g68c-fv3c: no withdrawal recorded

The official CVE record has state: REJECTED and dateRejected: 2026-10-12T19:33:32.335Z. The CNA gives only the generic rejected/withdrawn reason, with no technical explanation. The upstream discussion also notes the rejection.

This proposal records that public status without assuming that CVE rejection automatically invalidates an independent GHSA. It leaves withdrawn, affected versions, severity, and the existing technical description unchanged for the curation team's assessment. It does not claim a patched sprintf-js release exists.

Evidence

• Before: the advisory omits the October 12 CNA rejection and has no reference to the official rejected record.
• After: the CVE status is documented and linked to an immutable CVEProject commit; technical and affected-version fields remain unchanged.
• JSON and OSV schema validation passed; only this advisory is changed.

Merge Danger

Door: two-way

Blast Radius: metadata

No package code, affected ranges, or severity changes. Withdrawal remains a curation decision.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[G-Rath]

The advisory should be withdrawn.

I have forwarded GitHub a copy of my dispute that I made to VulnCheck and MITRE (after the former failed to respond in the required time per the CNA obligations)

[advisory-database]

Hi @BlackishGreen33! Thank you so much for contributing to the GitHub Advisory Database. This database is free, open, and accessible to all, and it's people like you who make it great. Thanks for choosing to help others. We hope you send in more contributions in the future!

[G-Rath]

While this says it was merged, what happened in actuality was the advisory was withdrawn by GH 🎉